Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged federal circuit · clear
Written by : Matthew S. Whitehead and Daniel Kiang ODYSSEY LOGISTICS & TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. STEWART Before Dyk , Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary : A patent applicant forfeited its…
Written by : James Raleigh and Daniel Kiang IMMUNOGEN, INC. v. STEWART Before Lourie , Dyk, and Prost. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary : A solution to a problem can be obvious even when the problem…
Written by : Isabella C. Pestana and Justin J. Gillett IN RE: XENCOR, INC. Before Hughes, Stark, and Schroeder (sitting by designation). Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : To provide adequate written…
Written by : Tyler S. Cox and Nathan D. Reeves APPLE INC. v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC Before Moore, Prost , and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial And Appeal Board. Summary : A patent owner forfeits its argument that an IPR petitioner lacks…
Written by : Jae Jin Lee and Douglas B. Wentzel CQV CO., LTD. v. MERCK PATENT GMBH Before Cunningham , Chen, and Mayer. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The Board erred by failing to explain why it discarded material and unrebutted…
Written by : Joshua M. Martineau and Douglas B. Wentzel SIERRA WIRELESS, ULC V. SISVEL S.P.A. Before Moore , Schall, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The Board erred by finding method-claim steps connected by…
Written by : Charles J. Sirek and Jacob R. Rosenbaum IQRIS TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES, INC. Before Lourie , Linn, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Summary : The district court…
Written by : Justin K. Theam and Kendall Loebbaka KROY IP HOLDINGS, LLC v. GROUPON, INC. Before Prost, Reyna , and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : Because there are different burdens of proof in IPRs and…
Written by : Matthew J. Petersen and Jeremy Anapol TRUDELL MED. INT’L INC. V. D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC Before Moore , Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Summary : The district court…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. Before: Lourie , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : A patent’s specification established a naming convention that…
Written by : Bryant Chen & Nathan D. Reeves STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. SHIBUYA HOPPMANN CORPORATION Before Moore , Hughes, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : Conflicting expert testimony…
Written by : Arash Pia & Daniel Kiang APPLE INC. v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC. Before Lourie, Dyk , and Hughes. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary : The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has jurisdiction over IPRs…
