Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged intellectual property law · clear
A New Jersey jury has awarded Eagle View Technology $125 million in patent damages. Eagle View originally sued its competitor Verisk and its subsidiary corporation Xactware, for infringing nine patents related to software for developing 3D models from…
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY v. GAMON PLUS, INC. Before Prost, Newman and Moore . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A proper primary reference can have slight differences in design if, in light of overall similarities, it conveys basically…
SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. Before O’Malley, Reyna, and Chen . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Reyna concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part Summary : The language “unobvious over the prior art” in the…
INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC v. IANCU Before Wallach, Chen , and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary : If a proper reply to a final Office Action is not filed within the three-month response…
INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC Before Prost , Newman, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Summary : Alleging that a contract issue implicates patent infringement may not…
MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Before: Newman, Lourie , and Dyk Summary : Where a request for continued…
HENNY PENNY CORPORATION v. FRYMASTER LLC Before Lourie , Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary : With respect to secondary considerations of nonobviousness, nexus may be satisfied by showing that objective…
CURVER LUXEMBOURG, SARL v. HOME EXPRESSIONS INC. Before Chen , Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary : Claim language specifying the article of manufacture can limit the scope of a design…
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP. Before Prost, Bryson , and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Summary: The Federal Circuit applied collateral estoppel and thus avoided deciding…
Written by : Mark Kachner A Chicago jury previously awarded Kolcraft Enterprises more than $3 million in damages based on Artsana’s infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,376,993, related to infant play equipment. Because the jury awarded Kolcraft almost…
BOARD OF REGENTS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary : The patent venue statute governs actions filed by a State as State sovereignty does not…
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC v. SANDOZ, INC. Before Prost, Newman, and Wallach . Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary : A “wherein” clause can be limiting if it is material to patentability. Allergan…
