Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged electronics · clear
HVLPO2, LLC v. OXYGEN FROG, LLC Before Newman, Moore, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Summary: It is an abuse of discretion to permit a witness to testify as an expert on issues of…
HENNY PENNY CORPORATION v. FRYMASTER LLC Before Lourie , Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary : With respect to secondary considerations of nonobviousness, nexus may be satisfied by showing that objective…
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC Before Moore , Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : If the technology is complex, a party may be required to provide more evidence of a reasonable expectation of…
QUEST INTEGRITY USA, LLC v. COKEBUSTERS USA INC. Before Dyk , Taranto, and Hughes. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: An affidavit should not be dismissed as a sham where: (1) the affidavit contradicts another…
AVX CORPORATION V. PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto . Appeal from the Patent and Trial Appeal Board. Summary: Appellants from an IPR decision to the Federal Circuit must have concrete claims of current or non-speculative…
Before Newman , O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : Diligence requires “reasonably continuous diligence” and is not negated if the inventor works on improvements and evaluates alternatives while…
Before Prost, Dyk , and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Summary : Asserting the district court’s claim construction prevented consideration of additional prior art, without identifying the…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost , Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Summary: An abstract idea cannot be used to supply an inventive concept that renders a claim “significantly more” than…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Reyna, Taranto . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : Where the preamble of a claim merely identifies an intended use and does not impose a structural requirement, and only the body of the claim…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Moore, Taranto, and Chen . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The mere fact that a certain thing may result from a given set of circumstances is not sufficient to demonstrate inherency. Instead, the…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Prost, Moore , and Wallach. Appeal from the Northern District of Florida. Summary : When a state entity sues for patent infringement, it waives sovereign immunity as to all defenses, including subject matter eligibility under…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Reyna, Taranto, and Chen . Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : Where the complexity and predictability of a claimed embodiment were disputed, summary judgment finding…
