Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged federal circuit · clear
U.S. v. Arthrex, Inc. Before the United States Supreme Court. Majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts. On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Summary: A statute preventing the PTO Director from reviewing IPR…
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. v. ITC Before Newman, Lourie, and Dyk. Appeal from the ITC. Summary: Patentees cannot escape the bounds of their claims by promoting oversimplified characterizations of those claims. Bio-Rad brought an ITC action against 10X…
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY v. BAXTER CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD Before Prost, Clevenger, and Dyk. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A patent that has issued and subsequently been canceled may be cited as a reference in an IPR. Becton…
NEW VISION GAMING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. V. SG GAMING, INC. Before Newman, Moore, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded two CBM decisions under Arthrex without resolving other issues…
TRIMBLE INC. v. PERDIEMCO LLC Before Judges Newman, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Repeated email, phone, and letter communications threatening patent infringement litigation…
UNILOC 2017 LLC v. APPLE INC. Before Prost, Bryson, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Evidence of the plain and ordinary meaning of the term “intercepting” as set forth in dictionary definitions was outweighed…
FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP. v. ALPHONSO INC. Before Judges Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Summary: Patent claims were directed to an abstract idea where the claims failed to recite…
PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA v. OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES Before Lourie, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Enablement is required for the full scope of the claimed invention.…
CAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC. Before Dyk, Bryson, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: A judgment and injunction were properly set aside pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(3) when it was discovered…
As we prepare to publish our first Federal Circuit IIntelligence Report , we plan to dive deep into the Federal Circuit patent cases, their origins, filing activity and its process. In Patexia Insight 103 , we examined the current trends of patent…
MOJAVE DESERT HOLDINGS, LLC v. CROCS, INC. Before Newman, Dyk, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Parties challenging patents in inter partes reexamination can assign their rights to others. U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.…
Before Lourie, Chen, and Hughes. Summary: Unrebutted evidence of non-enablement is sufficient to overcome an invalidity challenge based on a standalone §103 reference. Raytheon owns a patent claiming a gas turbine engine having a particular power…
