Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged intellectual property law · clear
Written by : E mily K. McCorry & Douglas B. Wentzel SSI TECHS., LLC v. DONGGUAN ZHENGYANG ELECTRONIC MECHANICAL LTD. Before Reyna, Bryson , and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Summary : The…
Written by : Arash Pia On January 31st, 2023, a jury awarded $42 million to medical device company TissueGen in a patent infringement case against Boston Scientific for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,596,296 , titled “Biodegradable Drug-Releasing…
Written by : Kregg Koch & Sabing Lee The original version of this article was published by Life Sciences IP Review. Click here to view that article. Bringing a medical device to market relies on a broad understanding of IP, explain Sabing Lee and Kregg…
Written by : Daniel Kiang & Timothy A. Willis PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC V. APPLE INC. Before Reyna, Chen, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: The district court did not abuse its…
Background On January 5, 2023, President Biden signed into law S. 1294, the “Protecting American Intellectual Property Act of 2022”. The Act requires the president to report to Congress and impose sanctions on any foreign person or entity the…
By Michael Rosen AEIdeas “It’s tough to make predictions,” Yogi Berra once said, “especially about the future.” This Yogiism continues to ring true, including in matters of innovation and intellectual property (IP) policy. So…
Written by : Philip M. Nelson In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi to decide whether an inventor must describe every example in a category to get an enforceable patent for that category. Must a patent simply give…
Written by : Brandon G. Smith GRACE INSTRUMENT INDUS. V. CHANDLER INSTRUMENTS CO. Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Summary: Terms of degree are not indefinite when the…
Written by : Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. & Rhett D. Ramsey In Re Google LLC Before: Moore , Lourie, and Prost. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The PTO’s arguments on appeal did not reflect the record below. Google filed an…
Written by : Mengmeng Du & Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. IN RE: STINGRAY IP SOLUTIONS, LLC Before Lourie, Taranto, and Stark . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A defendant’s post-suit, unilateral…
In this article for Law360, partner Tasha Gerasimow, with co-author David Gerasimow, assesses the Netflix movie "Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery" and how it relates to the current state of the law of intellectual property ownership, as well as…
Written by : Bryant Chen & Justin J. Gillett DIONEX SOFTRON GMBH v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Before: Reyna, Chen, and Stark . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The PTAB did not err in considering evidence corroborating actual…
