Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged software & information technology · clear
UNILOC 2017 LLC v. HULU, LLC Before O’Malley, Wallach, and Taranto. O’Malley dissenting. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board did not exceed its statutory authority in an inter partes review proceeding by rejecting…
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC Before PROST, DYK, and WALLACH. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Summary: The grant or denial of attorney fees requires consideration of…
Written by : Brok S. Humbert & Adam Powell UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. X ONE, INC. Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Because a mapping technique must be performed on…
CUSTOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK LLC . Before Prost, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Claims directed towards an abstract idea are…
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v. GOOGLE LLC Before Prost, Newman, and Moore. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The Board can institute IPR only on grounds raised in a petition. Additionally, the Board can rely on general knowledge of a skilled…
KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V. v. GEMALTO M2M GMBH Before Dyk, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the District of Delaware. Summary: Claims directed to improving the functionality of one tool that is part of a system do not necessarily need to recite how that tool is…
ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD Before Moore , Wallach, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary : When a reference is available in the same year as the critical…
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. INFOBRIDGE PTE. LTD. Before Newman, Schall, and O’Malley . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : A reference must be publicly accessible, not actually accessed, before the critical date to qualify…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Dyk, Taranto, Stoll . Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB is not required to make any finding regarding a motivation to combine two references when it concludes that a claim is invalid under…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Reyna, Wallach, and Hughes . Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: When the only unconventional feature of the patent claim is what has already been determined to be an abstract idea, the…
Federal Circuit Summary Before Lourie , O’Malley, and Taranto . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: Where remand of post-reexamination claims that issued during the pendency of an appeal would be…
