Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged electronics · clear
Written by : Morgan Robertson & Douglas B. Wentzel HEALTHIER CHOICES MANAGEMENT CORP. V. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. Before Taranto, Stoll , and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Summary : A…
Written by : Jack Hendershott & Jacob R. Rosenbaum SALAZAR V. AT&T MOBILITY LLC Before Stoll , Schall, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : While the indefinite article “a” means…
Written by : Robert W. Servilio & Jeremy Anapol LINE-NETICS, LLC v. NU TSAI CAPITAL LLC Before Lourie, Taranto , and Stark. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. Summary : Courts cannot enjoin speech by patentholders to third…
SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC v. HULU, LLC Before Prost, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: It was improper to find a claim limitation was missing without affirmatively construing…
Earlier this year, it was considered a rumor that EA Sports was considering a name change for its bestseller video game franchise. Since 1993 when the first FIFA International Soccer game was released, they have always used the FIFA trademark for the game…
TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS Before Prost, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: An applicant’s arguments distinguishing prior art during patent prosecution constituted a…
Traxcell Techs., LLC v. Sprint Commn’s Co. et al Before Prost, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: A patentee’s extensive citations to evidence failed to avoid summary judgment of noninfringement…
WI-LAN INC. v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Source code evidence found to be inadmissible hearsay with no exception to save it. Wi-LAN sued…
Infinity Computer Products v. Oki Data Americas, Inc. Before Prost, Clevenger, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Contradictory positions taken during prosecution and reexamination regarding the scope of…
SIONYX LLC v. HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. Before Lourie, Reyna, and Wallach. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Summary: A party who discloses confidential information pursuant to a NDA may be entitled to ownership of U.S.…
DONNER TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. PRO STAGE GEAR, LLC Before Prost, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A determination as to whether a reference is analogous art to a claimed invention requires, in part, an identification and…
Written by : Eric Malmgren & Hans L. Mayer APPLE INC. v. ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Before Dyk, Plager, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR petitioner relying on a prior-art algorithm is not required to discuss all…
