Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged intellectual property law · clear
Written by : Tyler S. Cox and Nathan D. Reeves APPLE INC. v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC Before Moore, Prost , and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial And Appeal Board. Summary : A patent owner forfeits its argument that an IPR petitioner lacks…
Written by : Jae Jin Lee and Douglas B. Wentzel CQV CO., LTD. v. MERCK PATENT GMBH Before Cunningham , Chen, and Mayer. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The Board erred by failing to explain why it discarded material and unrebutted…
Written by : Joshua M. Martineau and Douglas B. Wentzel SIERRA WIRELESS, ULC V. SISVEL S.P.A. Before Moore , Schall, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : The Board erred by finding method-claim steps connected by…
Written by : Bailey R. Arenberg and Jason J. Jardine Effective January 28, 2025, the new administration suspended the Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program (CCMPP) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [1] The USPTO had instituted…
Written by : Justin K. Theam and Kendall Loebbaka KROY IP HOLDINGS, LLC v. GROUPON, INC. Before Prost, Reyna , and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : Because there are different burdens of proof in IPRs and…
Written by : Matthew J. Petersen and Jeremy Anapol TRUDELL MED. INT’L INC. V. D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC Before Moore , Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Summary : The district court…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. Before: Lourie , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : A patent’s specification established a naming convention that…
Written by : Bailey R. Arenberg & Jason J. Jardine With the recent convocation of the 119 th Congress, a change in administration, and resignation of USPTO Director Vidal, pharmaceutical patent reform is likely on the minds of many in Washington. Prior to…
Written by : Bryant Chen & Nathan D. Reeves STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. SHIBUYA HOPPMANN CORPORATION Before Moore , Hughes, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : Conflicting expert testimony…
Written by : Arash Pia & Daniel Kiang APPLE INC. v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC. Before Lourie, Dyk , and Hughes. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary : The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has jurisdiction over IPRs…
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery and Daniel P. Hughes LYNK LABS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Before Lourie, Prost , and Stark Summary: In an IPR, a patent application is considered a “printed publication” as of the application’s…
Written by : Raymond S. Lu and Douglas B. Wentzel NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION v. TORRENT PHARMA INC. Before Lourie , Prost, and Reyna. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : A patent was not invalid for lack of…
