686 articles · page 14 of 58
Tomorrow we will release our 2022 CAFC Intelligence Report, where we have analyzed all the patent-related CAFC appeals from the USPTO, ITC, or district courts. The report covers a 5-year period, from Jan., 1, 2017, through Dec., 31, 2021, offering…
Just last week, a federal jury in Marshall, Texas, decided a patent infringement case between two of the three top automated key duplicating machines vendors. It all began back in June 2021, when Hy-Ko accused The Hillman Group’s duplication…
This month we will publish our second annual CAFC Intelligence Report 2022, which covers the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). This report will focus on the patent-related cases filed before the CAFC during the five-year period from Jan., 1,…
PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC. Before Prost, Reyna, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB has an obligation to ensure that its logic is reasonably discernible from the record. Weber petitioned for inter…
Amidst news related to trademark infringement lawsuits against Meta , with several companies claiming that the new Facebook company name infringes theirs, a Texas jury has ordered Meta to pay $174.5 million as damages for patent infringement. It began on…
POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED v. BRENT Before Prost, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Summary: Affirming the Board’s decision not to terminate case remanded under Arthrex I and upholding the Board’s claim…
It all goes back to 2019 when Philips accused Fitbit of infringement of four of its patents, 8,277,377 , 6,013,007 , 6,976,958 , and 7,088,233 . These patents were related to the technology used to manufacture connected-health products such as GPS/audio…
Tomorrow we will be releasing our sixth annual IPR Intelligence report, where we covered the IPR filing activity from July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2022. This report is our effort to fully cover the IPR landscape by analyzing data at a high level and…
BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ELEKTA INC. Before Hughes, Linn, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Expert testimony was properly discounted when substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that a POSA would…
IN RE: PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. Before Dyk , Reyna, and Chen. Summary: The USPTO policy of refusing to consider Requests for Director Rehearing of decisions denying institution of IPR and PGR does not violate the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.…
CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES LP V. INGENIO, INC., DBA KEEN, ETHER, THRYV, INC. Before Stoll , Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary: Ingenio’s IPR petition was partially…
LSI CORPORATION v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Before Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Determining whether a patent or application’s disclosure is “by another” under § 102(e)…
