Michigan Court Reinstates Its Full 254 Million Award to Stryker for Competitor S Infringing Wound Irrigation Devicesnter Title
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by Stephanie M. Johnson and Paul Stewart
Edited by John Sganga, Joe Cianfrani, and Boris Zelkind
On July 19, 2017, a federal court in Michigan awarded Stryker Sales Corporation (“Stryker”) a total of more than $254,000,000 in its patent infringement suit against Zimmer Inc. and Zimmer Surgical Inc. (“Zimmer”). This award included three times Stryker’s actual damages, plus over $9.5 million in attorneys’ fees and associated interest, nearly $25 million in pre-judgment interest, and $218K in post-judgment interest. The court also issued a permanent injunction against infringement of one of the asserted patents. The decision is the result of a seven year battle between Zimmer and Stryker. The dispute involved portable, battery powered, handheld, pulsed lavage devices, which deliver pressurized irrigation for certain medical therapies, including orthopedic procedures and the cleaning of wounds. In its trial brief, Stryker asked the court to award $70 million in lost profits, which represents 92% of Zimmer’s infringing sales. After a two-week trial, the jury awarded Stryker $70 million in lost profits, the full amount Stryker requested. The court also awarded supplemental damages for pre- and post-verdict sales, treble damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Zimmer then appealed the case to the Federal Circuit and, ultimately, to the Supreme Court. The appeals courts upheld the jury’s award of $70 million in actual damages to Stryker. The Federal Circuit sent the case back to the Michigan federal court to reconsider its award of attorneys’ fees and treble damages in light of recent Supreme Court decisions. The Michigan court, in turn, reinstated its full award of attorneys’ fees and treble damages, together with costs and interest, for a total award of $254,485,338.
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…