Merck Ordered to Pay 14 Million in Attorneys Fees to Rival Gilead After a Patent Infringement Trial Involving Hepatitis C Drugs
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by Mark Speegle and Sean Murray
Edited by John Sganga, Joseph Cianfrani, and Boris Zelkind
On July 14, 2017, in a stunning reversal of fortune, a federal court in San Jose, CA, which had previously set aside a $200 million jury verdict in favor of Merck, has now awarded accused infringer Gilead Sciences $13,857,106 in attorneys’ fees. Merck and several affiliates had asserted two U.S. patents against Gilead’s successful Solvadi® and Harvoni® drugs for oral treatments of Hepatitis C. The federal judge threw out the $200 million jury verdict after finding that Merck had improperly used confidential information from Gilead’s predecessor in obtaining the asserted patents, and then sought to conceal its misconduct during the litigation. In view of Merck’s misconduct, the court awarded Gilead its attorneys’ fees. The nearly $14 million in fees awarded by the court represents 90% of the amount requested by Gilead.
The underlying merits of this case are currently on appeal, and Gilead and Merck are engaged in additional litigation relating to the Solvadi® and Harvoni® drugs in other jurisdictions.
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…