Jury Awards 10 4 Million in Damages to Philips for Zoll S Infringement of Defibrillator Patents
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by Daniel Kiang and Marko R. Zoretic
Editors: Joseph Cianfrani and Boris Zelkind
Patent Judgments and Awards
On August 3, 2017, a Boston jury awarded Philips $10.4 million in damages for ZOLL’s infringement of three patents relating to automated external defibrillators. This represents only a fraction of the $200 in damages that Philips was seeking at trial. Philips originally sued its competitor, ZOLL, in 2010 for infringement of fifteen of its patents. In response, ZOLL counter sued with several of its own patents. In a 2013 trial focused on liability for patent infringement, a jury found that ZOLL infringed five of seven Philips patents that remained in the case, and that Philips infringed two of ZOLL’s patents. Philips and ZOLL appealed the liability determinations to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which invalidated some of the asserted patent claims. In the 2017 trial to determine the amount of damages, Philips asked the jury to award over $200 million as a reasonable royalty for the infringed patents. However, the jury returned a verdict of only $10.4 million in total damages to Philips for infringement of three of its patents. That award was further offset by a $3.3 million award to ZOLL for Philips’ infringement of its two patents.
The case is Koninklijke Philips, N.V., et al. v. Zoll Medical Corp., Civil Action No. 10-cv-11041 (D. Mass.)
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…