Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Cases
Contributed by Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
CASE OF THE WEEK
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation, Appeal No. 2022-1939 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2024)
Our Case of the Week focuses on a district court’s claim construction rulings in a patent case brought against Comcast concerning speech recognition technology used in cable television networks.
The complaint in this case was filed in 2016. From 2018 to 2020, the case was stayed pending disposition of inter partes reviews related to the patents. Appeals from those IPRs have been heard by the Federal Circuit. Back at the district court, during the Markman process, which took place before the completion of discovery, the district court largely adopted Comcast’s proposed constructions. The parties then stipulated to a dismissal of the case, pending appeal of the claim construction decisions.
ALSO THIS WEEK
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation, Appeal No. 2022-1093 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2024)
In a separate order, the Court admonished an attorney at Weil, Gotschal, representing Comcast, for violating court rules by incorporating by reference portions of briefs within other briefs before the Court, which would have resulted in Comcast exceeding the word limits set by the Federal Circuit. The Court relied on Microsoft Corp. v. DataTern, Inc., 755 F.3d 899, 910 (Fed. Cir. 2014), in which the same law firm was admonished for precisely the same violation. The Court found the attorneys’ explanation of being unaware of the rule unreasonable. However, it declined to order sanctions. It did provide this cautionary, precedential note to “future litigants”:
(1) it is improper to incorporate material from one brief by reference into another unless in compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 28; (2) in no event is such incorporation permitted if it would result in exceeding the applicable word count; and (3) violating these provisions in the future will likely result in sanctions.
The opinion can be found here.
Editors:
Nika Aldrich, IP Litigation Group Leader, Schwabe
Jason A. Wrubleski, Shareholder
More insights
Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Case
Ridge Corp. et al. v. Kirk NationaLease Co. et al. , Appeal No. 2025-1254 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2026) In its only precedential patent opinion last week, the Federal Circuit considered an appeal of a preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court…
Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Cases
CASE OF THE WEEK Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Appeal No. 2024-2325 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2026) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court ruling reversing a $107.5 million jury verdict against AstraZeneca in a case…
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc., Appeal No. 2025-1427 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 23, 2026)
CASE OF THE WEEK Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc., Appeal No. 2025-1427 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 23, 2026) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment invalidating all claims of Enanta’s Patent No. 11,358,953 as…