Fresh From the Bench: Latest Federal Circuit Court Case
Contributed by Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
CASE OF THE WEEK
Treehouse Avatar LLC v. Valve Corp., Appeal No. 2022-1171 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 30, 2022)
In the only precedential patent opinion issued by the Federal Circuit this week, the Court affirmed a district court’s summary judgment ruling that appellee Valve Corporation’s popular “Dota 2” and “Team Fortress 2” online videogames did not infringe Treehouse Avatar’s U.S. Patent No. 8,180,858, finding that the district court did not err in striking portions of Treehouse’s infringement expert report that failed to apply an agreed claim construction adopted by the court.
The ’858 patent is directed to methods of collecting data from user choices involving videogame character attributes such as weapons or clothing, and uses the phrase “character-enabled (CE) network sites” for certain elements of the systems described in the claims. The parties had agreed that the phrase should be construed to mean “a network location, other than a user device, operating under control of a site program to present a character, object, or scene to a user interface,” which the Court adopted. On summary judgment, Valve presented evidence that because character and other data were downloaded to and presented from a user’s own device and not an external server, the accused videogames did not infringe.
Read more.
Edited by Nika Aldrich and Scott D. Eads, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt
More insights
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation of Patent for Lack of Enablement of Claims Directed to a Method of Treating a Patient with a Unit Dosage in Wyeth Llc v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp
Written by : Eric Furman, Ph.D. and Ashley C. Morales Key Takeaway: Federal Circuit invalidates patent claims directed to a method for treating non-small cell lung cancer through administration of “a unit dosage” of an irreversible epidermal…
When About Becomes Indefinite Federal Circuit Provides Guidance for Life Science Patent Applications Regarding Limits of Approximation in Enviro Tech v Safe Foods
Written by : Jason J. Jardine and Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. Key Takeaway: The term “about” remains useful in biotech and pharmaceutical claims, but only if the patent provides objective guidance about what the term means. Absent that guidance,…
When Any Patent Means No Patent Federal Circuit Reverses Non Specific Verdict
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Sophia F. Zahn OLLNOVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC [OPINION] Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A verdict form…