877 articles · page 34 of 74
CASE OF THE WEEK Immunex Corp. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Appeal Nos. 2019-1749, -1777 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2020) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit addressed the construction of the term “human antibodies.” In doing so, the Court…
WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., v. SASSO Before Newman, Schall, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Summary: A federal court properly exercises its discretion to abstain from deciding declaratory…
CASE OF THE WEEK AntennaSys, Inc. v. AQYR Techs., Inc. , Appeal No. 2019-2244 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2020) In the only precedential opinion issued by the Federal Circuit this week, the Court declined to reach the merits of a judgment of noninfringement because…
ANTENNASYS, INC. v. AQYR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Before, O’Malley, Bryson, and Reyna. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire Summary: The Federal Circuit held that claim construction issues in a contract dispute did not meet…
CASE OF THE WEEK GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Appeal No. 2018-1976, -2023 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2020) Our Case of the Week focuses on the question of induced infringement, and particularly induced infringement in the context of…
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [OPINION] – PRECEDENTIAL Before Prost, Newman, and Moore. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware Summary: Evidence of inducement for a method of administering a drug is…
BIOGEN MA INC. v. EMD SERONO, INC. Before Newman, Linn, and Hughes. Appeal from the District Court of the District of New Jersey. Summary: A known method of administering a known product made by a new process is not novel. Biogen sued Serono and other…
CASE OF THE WEEK Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc. , Appeal No. 2018-1456, -1457 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2020) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit addressed two novel issues following inter partes review proceedings concerning two patents that were…
CASE OF THE WEEK Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC , Appeal Nos. 2018-1400 et al. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2020)‎ The only precedential decision this week was a modified panel decision of a prior precedential opinion following a petition for…
NEVILLE v. FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTORS, INC. Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: The Federal Circuit affirmed a construction of “end plate” that…
PHYTELLIGENCE, INC. v. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Summary: Under Washington law, a contract must be definite enough for a court to enforce…
BAXALTA INC. V. GENENTECH, INC. Before Moore, Plager, and Wallach. Appeal from the District of Delaware Summary: A district court erred by interpreting a specification’s description of an “antibody” as a definition, when that description…
