877 articles · page 28 of 74
UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC v. APPLE INC. Before Taranto, Wallach, and Stoll. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: A patentee’s reference to existing known methods and techniques in a specification, without…
COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC. Before Stoll, Reyna, and Schall. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: When a party distinguishes technology in the prior art to preserve validity, that same technology…
COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC. Before Stoll, Reyna, and Schall. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Summary: When a party distinguishes technology in the prior art to preserve validity, that same technology…
CASES OF THE WEEK Teva Pharms. Int’l GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Co. , Appeal Nos. 2020-1747, -1748, -1750 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2021) Eli Lilly and Co. v. Teva Pharms. Int’l GmbH , Appeal Nos. 2020-1876, -1877, -1878 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2021) In this…
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY V. GAMON PLUS, INC. Before Moore, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The standards for establishing a presumption of nexus or a nexus-in-fact between objective indicia of nonobviousness and…
HYATT v. HIRSHFELD Before Moore, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Summary: The phrase “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” in 35 U.S.C. § 145 does not invoke expert witness…
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS Before Lourie, Bryson and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: In claims for methods of using apparatuses or compositions, statements of intended purpose in a preamble tend to…
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The presumption of nexus analysis requires the fact finder to consider the unclaimed features of the stated…
CASE OF THE WEEK PersonalWeb Technologies LLC v. Google LLC , Appeal Nos. 2020-1543, -1553, -1554 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2021) In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s judgment on the pleadings that the…
In Re PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC Before Prost, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: A patent directed to a medley of mental processes with no inventive concept is patent ineligible under 35…
SEABED GEOSOLUTIONS (US) INC. v. MAGSEIS FF LLC. Before Moore, Linn, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Where a claim term’s meaning is clear from the intrinsic evidence, no extrinsic evidence of special meaning is…
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [OPINION] – PRECEDENTIAL Before Moore, Newman, Prost (dissent). Panel rehearing of an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware Summary: Substantial evidence supported the…
