877 articles · page 22 of 74
KAUFMAN v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Before Dyk, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the District Court for the Southern District of New York Summary: An “automatic” method does not require all steps in the method to be performed without user input and…
MITEK SYS., INC. V. UNITED SERVS. AUTO. ASS’N Before Dyk, Taranto, and Cunningham. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary: Declaratory judgment plaintiffs must identify particular facts supporting standing and…
CASE OF THE WEEK Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards Inc. , Appeal No. 2021-1759 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2022) In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit Court addressed the third appeal from an underlying inter partes review…
SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC v. HULU, LLC Before Prost, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: It was improper to find a claim limitation was missing without affirmatively construing…
AURIS HEALTH, INC., v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., Before Dyk, Prost , and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Summary : Evidence of generic industry skepticism cannot, by itself, form the basis to preclude a finding of…
CASE OF THE WEEK Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. U.S. Venture, Inc. , Appeal Nos. 2020-1640, -1641 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2022) Our Case of the Week has a little bit for everyone, including analysis concerning, lost profits, reasonable…
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING v. U.S. VENTURE, INC. Before Prost , Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Summary : References to testing in an offer for sale do not necessarily trigger application…
CASE OF THE WEEK Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc. , Appeal No. 2021-1760 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 18, 2022)‎ In its only precedential patent case this week, the Federal Circuit addressed the extent to which a party exposes itself to personal jurisdiction for…
APPLE INC. v. ZIPIT WIRELESS, INC. [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL Before Hughes, Mayer and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Notice letters and related communications may be sufficient to…
CASE OF THE WEEK Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical SC, Inc. , Appeal No. 2021-1864 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2022) The Federal Circuit’s only precedential patent decision this week comes on appeal from a district court decision finding…
NIAZI LICENSING CORPORATION v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC. Before Taranto, Bryson, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Summary: Providing examples in the claim language and written description may provide…
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION v. MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC Before Newman, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: A finding of inducing infringement requires knowledge that the induced acts…
