Eli Lilly Ordered to Pay German Drug Company $20 Million for Infringing Sales of Cialis
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by Stephanie M. Johnson and Paul Stewart
Edited by John Sganga, Joseph Cianfrani, and Boris Zelkind
On July 18, 2017, after two years of litigation and a jury trial, a Texas federal court ordered Eli Lilly & Co. (“Eli Lilly”) to pay Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”) $20,000,000 in damages and over $930,000 in pre-judgment interest for patent infringement. The case arose from Eli Lilly’s marketing of its famous drug, Cialis. Though originally marketed as a drug to treat sexual dysfunction, Eli Lilly also marketed the drug as a treatment for prostate disease. Sales of Cialis for the treatment of prostate disease were significant, totaling over $704 million. On July 1, 2015, UroPep sued Eli Lilly, alleging that by marketing Cialis to treat prostate disease, Eli Lilly was inducing the infringement of UroPep’s patent on a method for treating prostate disease. The jury found that UroPep’s patent was valid and infringed, and awarded UroPep $20 million as a reasonable royalty for the use of UroPep’s patented invention. After trial, the judge awarded UroPep an additional royalty for Eli Lilly’s continued use of its invention for the three month period between the end of trial and the expiration date of UroPep’s patent.
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…