Early Stage Patent Infringement (June 06, 2011)
Last week there were about 36 new patent cases:
1. X2Y Attenuators LLC v. Intel Corporation et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00117 filed on 5/31/2011 in Western District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff(s): X2Y Attenuators LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Alston & Bird
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Michael J. Chapman
Defendant(s): Intel Corporation; Apple Inc.; Hewlett-Packard Co.
Patent(s): 7,733,621 - Energy conditioning circuit arrangement for integrated circuit
7,609,500 - Universal energy conditioning interposer with circuit architecture
7,916,444
6,738,249 - Universal energy conditioning interposer with circuit architecture
7,110,227 - Universial energy conditioning interposer with circuit architecture
2. T.F.H. Publications Inc. v. 3M Company
Case: 3:11-cv-03106 filed on 5/31/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): T.F.H. Publications Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Greenberg Dauber Epstein & Tucker PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Russell S. Burnside
Defendant(s): 3M Company
Patent(s): 6126978 - Edible dog chew
3. Stragent, LLC et. al. v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-00278 filed on 5/31/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Stragent, LLC; SeeSaw Foundation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Albritton Law Firm; Williams Morgan & Amerson PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Eric M. Albritton; Stephen E. Edwards; Debra R. Coleman; Matthew C. Harris; Danny L. Williams; J. Mike Amerson; Jaison C. John; Christopher N. Cravey; Matthew R. Rodgers; Michael A. Benefield; David Morehan
Defendant(s): Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc.; Pioneer North America, Inc.; Pioneer Corporation; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. d/b/a Audi of America, Inc.; Volkswagen AG; Audi AG; BMW of North America, LLC; Bayerische Motoren Werke AG; Chrysler Group LLC; Honda of America Mfg., Inc.; American Honda Motor Co. Inc.; Honda North America, Inc.; Honda Motor Company, Ltd.; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; Daimler AG; Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.; Mitsubishi Motors Corporation; Nissan North America, Inc.; Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.; Porsche Cars North America, Inc.; Dr. Ing. hc. F. Porsche AG; Toyota Motor North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.; Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Corporation
Patent(s): 7953599
4. Purple Leaf, LLC v. American Express Company et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-00279 filed on 5/31/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Purple Leaf, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Navarro Huff PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Winston O. Huff; Arthur I. Navarro
Defendant(s): American Express Company; CitiGroup, Inc.; Fiserv, Inc.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; PNC Bank, N.A.; SAP America, Inc.
Patent(s): 7603311 - Process and device for conducting electronic transactions
5. Quiring Monuments Inc v. Memory Medallion Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-00909 filed on 5/31/2011 in Western District of Washington
Plaintiff(s): Quiring Monuments Inc
Plaintiff law firm(s): Black Lowe & Graham PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Joel B. Ard
Defendant(s): Memory Medallion Inc.
Patent(s): 6,279,830 - Two-dimensional code, reading and producing method and recording medium storing related software
6,135,353 - 2-dimensional code reader
5,938,727 - Communication system and method via digital codes
6,494,375 - Information-code-image capturing apparatus
6,267,926 - Device for removing entrained gases from liquids
7,395,960 - System and method for delivering information at remote locations
6,360,948 - Method of reading two-dimensional code and storage medium thereof
6. New Angle Direct LLC et. al. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-02608 filed on 5/31/2011 in Eastern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): New Angle Direct LLC; One Barstow Properties, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Wechsler & Wechsler PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Robert E. Wechsler
Defendant(s): Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Patent(s): 5636592 - Portable device for feeding animals
7. Lodsys, LLC v. Combay, Inc. et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00272 filed on 5/31/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Lodsys, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): The Davis Firm PC; Kelley Donion Gill Huck & Goldfarb PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): William E. Davis III; Christopher M. Huck; Michael A. Goldfarb
Defendant(s): Combay, Inc.; Iconfactory, Inc.; Illusion Labs AB; Michael G. Karr d/b/a Shovelmate; Quickoffice, Inc.; Richard Shinderman; Wulven Game Studios
Patent(s): 7,620,565
7,222,078 - Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network
8. IP Forensics, LLC v. Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC
Case: 4:11-cv-00311 filed on 5/31/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): IP Forensics, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Konczal Law Firm PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Michael T. Konczal
Defendant(s): Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC
Patent(s): 4,555,861 - Firing pin locking device
4,754,689 - Combination plastic spring guide and buffer for automatic pistol
9. HTC America Inc. et. al. v. SoftView LLC
Case: 2:11-cv-00908 filed on 5/31/2011 in Western District of Washington
Plaintiff(s): HTC America Inc.; HTC Corporation; Exedea Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Perkins Coie LLP; Keker & Van Nest LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Ryan J. McBrayer; Leo L. Lam; Ashok Ramani
Defendant(s): SoftView LLC
Patent(s): 7,461,353 - Scalable display of internet content on mobile devices
7,831,926
10. Freedom Scientific, Inc. v. Aaron J. Silberman, Michael John Colitz, III of GrayRobinson, PA
Case: 8:11-cv-01194 filed on 5/31/2011 in Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): Freedom Scientific, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): GrayRobinson, PA
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Aaron J. Silberman; Michael John Colitz, III
Defendant(s): Aaron J. Silberman, Michael John Colitz, III of GrayRobinson, PA
Patent(s): 7929013
11. Medtronic, Inc. et. al. v. Brasseler USA, Inc.
Case: 0:11-cv-01404 filed on 5/31/2011 in District of Minnesota
Plaintiff(s): Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic PS Medical, Inc.; Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.; Medtronic USA, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Fredrikson & Byron PA
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kurt J. Niederluecke; Laura L. Myers; Lora M. Friedemann; Ted C. Koshiol
Defendant(s): Brasseler USA, Inc.
Patent(s): 7,066,940 - Surgical instrument with rotary cutting member and quick release coupling arrangement
7,011,661 - Surgical instrument with rotary cutting member and quick release coupling arrangement
12. Genetec Inc. v. James Simon
Case: 1:11-cv-01007 filed on 5/31/2011 in District of Columbia
Plaintiff(s): Genetec Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen E. Baskin; Geoffrey K. Gavin; Tiffany L. Williams
Defendant(s): James Simon
Patent(s): 7,881,498
7,711,150 - Autonomous wide-angle license plate recognition
13. Pfizer Inc. et. al. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-03130 filed on 5/31/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): Pfizer Inc.; Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC; Pfizer Health AB
Plaintiff law firm(s): Gibbons PC; White & Case LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David E. DeLorenzi; Sheila F. McShane; Dimitrios T. Drivas; Jeffrey J. Oelke; Adam Gahtan; James S. Trainor Jr.
Defendant(s): Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Patent(s): 5382600 - 3,3-diphenylpropylamines and pharmaceutical compositions thereof
14. Riverbed Technology Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-00484 filed on 6/1/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Riverbed Technology Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Arsht & Tunnell LLP; Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Thomas C. Grimm; Matthew B. Lehr; Anthony I. Fenwick; Chung G. Suh; Jeremy Brodsky
Defendant(s): Silver Peak Systems Inc.
Patent(s): 7,428,573 - Transaction accelerator for client-server communication systems
7,853,699
7,849,134
7,953,869
15. Philpott Specialty Products Ltd. v. Zuru, LLC et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-01121 filed on 6/1/2011 in Northern District of Ohio
Plaintiff(s): Philpott Specialty Products Ltd.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Rankin Hill Clark
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Randolph E. Digges, III
Defendant(s): Zuru, LLC; Zuru Inc.; Zuru Ltd.; The Bridge Direct, Inc.
Patent(s): 5673464 - Cargo securement system and tie down strap
16. ArrivalStar S.A. v. Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC
Case: 2:11-cv-00912 filed on 6/1/2011 in Western District of Washington
Plaintiff(s): ArrivalStar S.A.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Mann Law Group
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Philip P Mann; John Whitaker
Defendant(s): Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC
Patent(s): 7,030,781 - Notification system and method that informs a party of vehicle delay
6,904,359
17. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. AU Optronics Corp. et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00485 filed on 6/1/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Richards Layton & Finger PA; O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Frederick L. Cottrell III; Jason J. Rawnsley; Kelly E. Farnan; George A. Riley; Brian Berliner; Jon Y. Chow; Xin-Yi Zhou; Yixin Zhang
Defendant(s): AU Optronics Corp.; AU Optronics Corporation America; Acer America Corporation; Acer Inc.; BenQ America Corp.; BenQ Corp.; Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd.; Sanyo North America Corporation
Patent(s): 7,787,087 - Liquid crystal display having wide viewing angle
6,882,375 - Thin film transistor array substrate for liquid crystal display
7,535,537 - Liquid crystal display module and an assembly method therefor
6,771,344 - Liquid crystal display having wide viewing angle
18. Richard B Shreck v. CEC Entertainment Inc
Case: 4:11-cv-00454 filed on 6/1/2011 in Eastern District of Arkansas
Plaintiff(s): Richard B Shreck
Plaintiff law firm(s): Speed Law Firm
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Gary N. Speed
Defendant(s): CEC Entertainment Inc
Patent(s): D589627 - Money grab machine
19. Bose Corporation v. Able Planet, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-01435 filed on 6/1/2011 in District of Colorado
Plaintiff(s): Bose Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Greenberg Traurig LLP; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jennifer H. Weddle; Gayle L. Strong; John Regan; Mark Matuschak; Don Steinberg; Karen D. Stringer
Defendant(s): Able Planet, Inc.
Patent(s): D491163 - Headset
5,181,252 - High compliance headphone driving
D541255 - Headset
4,922,542 - Headphone comfort
20. Systemation Inc. v. Production Products Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-00487 filed on 6/1/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Systemation Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP; Breiner & Breiner LLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kristen H. Cramer; Theodore A. Breiner; Jennifer A. Harchick
Defendant(s): Production Products Inc.
Patent(s): 5342100 - Angle plates for transverse duct flanges
21. Pictometry International Corporation v. Geospan Corporation
Case: 0:11-cv-01423 filed on 6/1/2011 in District of Minnesota
Plaintiff(s): Pictometry International Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Harter Secrest & Emery LLP; Dunlap Codding PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Brian B. Shaw; Jerauld E. Brydges; Joseph P Tetterington; D. Ward Hobson; Douglas J. Sorocco
Defendant(s): Geospan Corporation
Patent(s): 5247356 - Method and apparatus for mapping and measuring land
22. Philpott Specialty Products Ltd. v. Zuru, LLC et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-01121 filed on 6/1/2011 in Northern District of Ohio
Plaintiff(s): Philpott Specialty Products Ltd.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Rankin Hill Clark
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Randolph E. Digges, III
Defendant(s): Zuru, LLC; Zuru Inc.; Zuru Ltd.; The Bridge Direct, Inc.
Patent(s): 5673464 - Cargo securement system and tie down strap
23. Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Lindsay Corporation et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-00284 filed on 6/2/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Valmont Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Fish & Richardson PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Neil J. McNabnay; P. Weston Musselman Jr.; David B. Conrad; Jane J. Du
Defendant(s): Lindsay Corporation; Farmscan AG Pty Ltd.; Board of Regents of the University of Idaho
Patent(s): 5246164 - Method and apparatus for variable application of irrigation water and chemicals
24. Select Retrieval, LLC v. ABT Electronics, Inc. et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-03752 filed on 6/2/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Select Retrieval, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Greer Burns & Crain Ltd.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Patrick G. Burns
Defendant(s): ABT Electronics, Inc.; Ace Hardware Corp.; Action Village, LLC; Calumet Photographic, Inc.; Chelsea & Scott, Ltd.; Euromarket Designs, Inc. d/b/a Crate & Barrel; Fansedge Inc.; OfficeMax Inc.; OpticsPlanet, Inc.; Sears Holding Corp.; Walgreen Co.; Whitney Automotive Group, Inc.; W.W. Grainger, Inc.; Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Patent(s): 5,953,724 - Global database library data structure for hierarchical graphical listing computer software
6,128,617 - Data display software with actions and links integrated with information
25. Select Retrieval LLC v. Blinds, Inc. et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-01166 filed on 6/2/2011 in Northern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Select Retrieval LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Dietz & Jarrard PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): R. Mark Dietz
Defendant(s): Blinds, Inc.; Calendars.Com, LLC; GameStop Corp.; JC Penney Company Inc.; Radioshack Corporation; Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.; Team Express Distributing, Inc.; The Container Store Inc.; Zale Corporation; Richlund Ventures Inc.
Patent(s): 5953724 - Global database library data structure for hierarchical graphical listing computer software
26. Qaxaz LLC v. BMW of North America LLC et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00491 filed on 6/2/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Qaxaz LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Bayard PA; Stevens Love; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Richard D. Kirk; Stephen B. Brauerman; Scott E. Stevens; Gregory P. Love; Darrell G. Dotson; Todd Y. Brandt; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): BMW of North America LLC; Ford Motor Company; General Motors Company; Mercedes-Benz USA LLC; Microsoft Corporation; OnStar Corp.; Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc.
Patent(s): 7917285
27. Marie Claire/Hearst et. al. v. Webvention Holdings LLC et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00488 filed on 6/2/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Marie Claire/Hearst; The Hearst Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Ashby & Geddes; The Hearst Corporation; Kaye Scholer LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Steven J. Balick; Caroline Hong; Lauren E. Maguire; Jonathan R. Donnellan; Ravi V. Sitwala; Alan M. Fisch; Coke M. Stewart
Defendant(s): Webvention Holdings LLC; Webvention LLC
Patent(s): 5251294 - Accessing, assembling, and using bodies of information
28. Kirker Enterprises, Inc. v. Genosco
Case: 2:11-cv-03195 filed on 6/2/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): Kirker Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen B. Goldman; Arnold I. Rady; Gregory M. Reilly
Defendant(s): Genosco
Patent(s): 5935590 - Fingernail lacquer composition and method of application
29. Datatreasury Corporation v. U.S. Bancorp et. al.
Case: 5:11-cv-00108 filed on 6/2/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Datatreasury Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Nix Patterson & Roach LLP; Kendall Law Group LLP; Albritton Law Firm; Ward & Smith Law Firm; Ostrow Kaufman LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Nelson J. Roach; Derek Gilliland; C. Cary Patterson; Brady Paddock; R. Benjamin King; Anthony Bruster; Rod Cooper; Edward Chin; Nicole R. Kliewer; Andrew Wright; Joe Kendall; Karl Rupp; Eric M. Albritton; T. John Ward Jr.; Seth Ostrow; Matthew L. Kaufman; Jeanpierre J. Giuliano; Elyssa S. Lane
Defendant(s): U.S. Bancorp; U.S. Bank National Association
Patent(s): 5,910,988 - Remote image capture with centralized processing and storage
6,032,137 - Remote image capture with centralized processing and storage
30. CodePro Innovations, LLC v. Blockbuster Inc. et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-01171 filed on 6/2/2011 in Northern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): CodePro Innovations, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Dietz & Jarrard PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): R. Mark Dietz
Defendant(s): Blockbuster Inc.; Kohl's Illinois, Inc.; JC Penney Company Inc.; Redbox, LLC
Patent(s): 5,924,078 - Consumer-provided promotional code actuatable point-of-sale discounting system
5,717,866 - Method for comparative analysis of consumer response to product promotions
31. Synopsys Inc. v. Extreme DA Corp.
Case: 1:11-cv-00490 filed on 6/2/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Synopsys Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Ashby & Geddes; Fenwick & West LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): John G. Day; Tiffany G. Lydon; Andrew C. Mayo; Darryl M. Woo; David L. Hayes; Hector Ribera; Bryan A. Kohm
Defendant(s): Extreme DA Corp.
Patent(s): 5579510 - Method and structure for use in static timing verification of synchronous circuits
32. Concaten, Inc. v. Delcan Corporation et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-01440 filed on 6/2/2011 in District of Colorado
Plaintiff(s): Concaten, Inc.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David Anthony Palladino
Defendant(s): Delcan Corporation; Intelligent Networks; Delcan Technologies, Inc.
Patent(s): 7714705 - Maintenance decision support system and method
33. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. AU Optronics Corp. et. al.
Case: 5:11-cv-02620 filed on 6/3/2011 in Northern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
Plaintiff law firm(s): O'Melveny and Myers LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jon Y Chow; Brian Mark Berliner; George A. Riley; Xin-Yi Zhou; Yixin Zhang
Defendant(s): AU Optronics Corp.; AU Optronics Corporation America; Acer America Corporation; BenQ America Corp.; Benq Corporation; Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.; Sanyo North America Corporation
Patent(s): 7,264,480 - Display device
6,954,248 - Liquid crystal displays having multi-domains and a manufacturing method thereof
34. Cardiovascular Biotherapeutics, Inc v. Phage Biotechnology Corporation et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-01215 filed on 6/3/2011 in Southern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Cardiovascular Biotherapeutics, Inc
Plaintiff law firm(s): Zeiler Law Group
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kerry P. Zeiler
Defendant(s): Phage Biotechnology Corporation; New technologies Holding Pte Ltd.; Phage Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Thomas J Stegmann; Frederick M. Chanson
Patent(s): 7252818 - Method of producing biologically active human acidic fibroblast growth factor and its use in promoting angiogenesis
35. Waters Industries, Inc. v. JJI International, Inc. et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-03791 filed on 6/3/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Waters Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Timothy P. Maloney; Steven C. Schorer; Mark A. Borsos; Calista J. Mitchell
Defendant(s): JJI International, Inc.; Stein Mart, Inc.
Patent(s): 6,612,695 - Lighted reading glasses
7,938,553
6,863,416 - Lighting device
7,377,664 - Lighting device
36. Helen of Troy Texas Corporation et. al. v. Sorensen Research & Development
Case: 1:11-cv-00457 filed on 6/3/2011 in Western District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Helen of Troy Texas Corporation; Helen of Troy Nevada Corporation; Hot Nevada, Inc.; OXO International, Ltd.
Plaintiff law firm(s): K & L Gates LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Roderick B. Williams; James G. Warriner
Defendant(s): Sorensen Research & Development
Patent(s): 6,599,460 - Prevention of void-based-irregularity formation in thin-wall, injection-molded plastic product
4,935,184 - Stabilized injection molding when using a common mold part with separate complimentary mold parts
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…