Early Stage Patent Infringement (July 11, 2011)
Last week was a shorter week due to 4th of July long weekend. Only 34 new cases were filed last week:
1. Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00306 filed on 7/4/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Capshaw DeRieux LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Elizabeth L. DeRieux
Defendant(s): Google; Microsoft
Patent(s): 7,043,450 - Paid search engine bid management
7,974,912
2. Wm. T. Burnett Fiber LLC v. Milliken & Company et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-01828 filed on 7/4/2011 in District of Maryland
Plaintiff(s): Wm. T. Burnett Fiber LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Venable LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): James K. Archibald
Defendant(s): Milliken & Company; Precision Custom Coatings
Patent(s): 7,410,920 - Lightweight nonwoven fire retardant barrier
7,851,392
3. Microchip Technology Incorporated v. LSI et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-01326 filed on 7/5/2011 in District of Arizona
Plaintiff(s): Microchip Technology Incorporated
Plaintiff law firm(s): Covington & Burling LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Alan H. Blankenheimer; Jo Dale Carothers
Defendant(s): LSI; Agere Systems
Patent(s): 5,693,561 - Method of integrated circuit fabrication including a step of depositing tungsten
6,153,543 - High density plasma passivation layer and method of application
5,373,180 - Planar isolation technique for integrated circuits
5,663,900 - Electronic simulation and emulation system
5,523,259 - Method of forming metal layers formed as a composite of sub-layers using Ti texture control layer
5,599,739 - Barrier layer treatments for tungsten plug
4. IpVenture Inc. v. Fujitsu America et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00588 filed on 7/5/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): IpVenture Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Blank Rome LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Steven L. Caponi
Defendant(s): Fujitsu America; Lenovo; Fujitsu; Lenovo Group
Patent(s): 7,506,190 - Thermal and power management for computer systems
7,937,599
5. Adams Arms, Inc. v. Sig Sauer Inc.
Case: 8:11-cv-01473 filed on 7/5/2011 in Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): Adams Arms, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Mindi M. Richter; Jason Paul Stearns; John Todd Timmerman
Defendant(s): Sig Sauer Inc.
Patent(s): 7,739,939 - Direct drive retrofit for rifles
7,971,518
7,469,624 - Direct drive retrofit for rifles
6. Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Klein Tools, Inc.
Case: 3:11-cv-00322 filed on 7/5/2011 in Western District of North Carolina
Plaintiff(s): Irwin Industrial Tool Company
Plaintiff law firm(s): McGuireWoods LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Robert Ashley Muckenfuss
Defendant(s): Klein Tools, Inc.
Patent(s): 6890133 - Stepped drill bit having split tip
7. Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Tdm America, LLC
Case: 2:11-cv-03850 filed on 7/5/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): Weeks Marine, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Gibbons, Pc
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David E. Delorenzi
Defendant(s): Tdm America, LLC
Patent(s): 5,931,605 - Remediation of earthen material
6,293,731 - Method for treatment of dredged materials to form a structural fill
8. John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc v. Corning Gilbert Inc.
Case: 5:11-cv-00761 filed on 7/5/2011 in Northern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc
Plaintiff law firm(s): Hiscock, Barclay Law Firm
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Douglas J. Nash; Gabriel M. Nugent; Alpa V. Patel
Defendant(s): Corning Gilbert Inc.
Patent(s): 6,558,194 - Connector and method of operation
6,848,940 - Connector and method of operation
6,153,830 - Connector and method of operation
9. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04551 filed on 7/5/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jack B. Blumenfeld; Karen Jacobs Louden
Defendant(s): Nycomed US Inc.
Defendant law firm(s): WilmerHale; Richards, Layton & Finger, PA
Defendant lawyer(s): David A. Manspeizer; Andrew B. Zoltan; Christine Duh; Jeffrey L. Moyer; Jason James Rawnsley
Patent(s): 7,217,422 - Compositions and methods for enhancing corticosteroid delivery
7,794,738 - Compositions and methods for enhancing corticosteroid delivery
6,765,001 - Compositions and methods for enhancing corticosteroid delivery
7,220,424 - Compositions and methods for enhancing corticosteroid delivery
10. Lodsys, LLC v.
Case: 2:11-cv-00309 filed on 7/5/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Lodsys, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): DriveTime Automotive Group; Eset; ForeSee Results; OpinionLab; New York Times Company; LivePerson
Patent(s): 7,620,565
7,222,078 - Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network
5,999,908 - Customer-based product design module
11. BioTex, Inc. v. Heidelberg Engineering, Inc.
Case: 3:11-cv-00309 filed on 7/5/2011 in Southern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): BioTex, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): DiNovo Price Ellwanger and Hardy LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Andrew Gerald DiNovo
Defendant(s): Heidelberg Engineering, Inc.
Patent(s): 6507747 - Method and apparatus for concomitant structural and biochemical characterization of tissue
12. Yao-Hung Huang et. al. v. Marklyn Group Inc
Case: 1:11-cv-01765 filed on 7/6/2011 in District of Colorado
Plaintiff(s): Yao-Hung Huang; Big Time Auto Parts Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Lathrop & Gage, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Aaron P. Bradford
Defendant(s): Marklyn Group Inc
Patent(s): D614780 - Flexible attachment strip having a plurality of forward facing LEDs
13. Arizona Board of Regents et. al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-00595 filed on 7/6/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Arizona Board of Regents; Intervet
Plaintiff law firm(s): Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Mary B. Graham
Defendant(s): Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.
Patent(s):
14. Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Motorola Mobility Holdings et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-04574 filed on 7/6/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Ltd.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Arthur Anthony Gasey; Paul Christopher Gibbons; Raymond P. Niro
Defendant(s): Motorola Mobility Holdings; Samsung Electronics
Patent(s): 7065750 - Method and apparatus for preserving precise exceptions in binary translated code
15. Vibram S.P.A. et. al. v. Fila U.S.A., Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-11192 filed on 7/6/2011 in District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff(s): Vibram S.P.A.; Vibram
Plaintiff law firm(s): Cantor Colburn LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Michael J. Rye
Defendant(s): Fila U.S.A., Inc.
Patent(s): D579181 - Footwear
7,805,860 - Footwear having independently articuable toe portions
D582134 - Footwear
16. San Francisco Technology Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-03865 filed on 7/6/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): San Francisco Technology Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Mount Sperlman & Fingerman PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kathryn G. Spelman; Daniel H. Fingerman
Defendant(s): Pfizer, Inc.
Patent(s): 5087454 - Ibuprofen tablet
17. Shire Development et. al. v. Roxane Laboratiores, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-03886 filed on 7/6/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): Shire Development; Shire
Plaintiff law firm(s): Gibbons, Pc
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Michael R. Griffinger; Lisa H. Wang
Defendant(s): Roxane Laboratiores, Inc.
Patent(s): 7,718,619 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,700,561 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,678,770 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,223,735 - Abuse resistant lysine amphetamine compounds
7,674,774 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,687,467 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,659,254 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,655,630 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,723,305 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,671,030 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,678,771 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
7,105,486 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine compounds
7,687,466 - Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs
18. Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. MetroPCS Wireless et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-00348 filed on 7/6/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Fenner Investments, Ltd.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Loewinsohn Flegle Deary LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jim L. Flegle
Defendant(s): MetroPCS Wireless; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; MetroPCS Communications; Metropcs Texas
Patent(s): 5561706 - System for managing access by mobile users to an interconnected communications network where a billing authority is identified by a billing code from the user
19. Eset LLC v. Lodsys LLC
Case: 2:11-cv-00650 filed on 7/6/2011 in Eastern District of Wisconsin
Plaintiff(s): Eset LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Jones Day
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Nicola A. Pisano
Defendant(s): Lodsys LLC
Patent(s): 7,620,565
7,222,078 - Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network
7,133,834 - Product value information interchange server
5,999,908 - Customer-based product design module
20. Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00598 filed on 7/7/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Mosaid Technologies Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Bayard, P.A.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen B. Brauerman; Richard D. Kirk
Defendant(s): Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications; HTC America
Patent(s): 6,518,889 - Voice-activated personal alarm
5,650,770 - Self-locating remote monitoring systems
6,198,390 - Self-locating remote monitoring systems
21. Crystal Photonics, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Case: 6:11-cv-01118 filed on 7/7/2011 in Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): Crystal Photonics, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Angela M. Miller
Defendant(s): Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Patent(s): 7151261 - Method of enhancing performance of cerium doped lutetium orthosilicate crystals and crystals produced thereby
22. Kar Enterprises, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
Case: 1:11-cv-11200; 4:11-cv-11200 filed on 7/7/2011 in District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff(s): Kar Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Lambert & Associates
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David J. Connaughton; Gary E. Lambert
Defendant(s): Ford Motor Company
Patent(s): 7,757,803 - Motor vehicle operator identification and maximum speed limiter
7,959,177
23. Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Case: 2:11-cv-12945 filed on 7/7/2011 in Eastern District of Michigan
Plaintiff(s): Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Mantese Assoc.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Ian M. Williamson
Defendant(s): Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Patent(s): 5,724,092 - Videophone interactive mailbox facility system and method of processing information
5,606,361 - Videophone interactive mailbox facility system and method of processing information
24. Frank Kauer et. al. v. Nostalgia Products Group, LLC
Case: 3:11-cv-00330 filed on 7/7/2011 in Western District of North Carolina
Plaintiff(s): Frank Kauer; Access Asia
Plaintiff law firm(s): Moore & Van Allen PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): J Mark Wilson
Defendant(s): Nostalgia Products Group, LLC
Patent(s): D632123
25. Ferring B.V. v. Watson Laboratories et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-00481 filed on 7/7/2011 in District of Nevada
Plaintiff(s): Ferring B.V.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Jones Vargas
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Molly Malone Rezac
Defendant(s): Watson Laboratories; Watson Pharmaceuticals; Watson Laboratories, Inc. - Florida
Patent(s): 7947739
26. Purdue Pharma L.P. et. al. v. Sandoz Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04694 filed on 7/7/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Purdue Pharma L.P.; The P.F. Laboratories, Inc.; Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.; Rhodes Technologies; Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System; Grunenthal GMBH
Plaintiff law firm(s): Ropes & Gray Llp; R. Kunstadt, P.C.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Sona de; Robert J. Goldman; Pablo Daniel Hendler; Robert M. Kunstadt; Ilaria Maggioni
Defendant(s): Sandoz Inc.
Patent(s): 7,683,072 - Oxycodone hydrochloride having less than 25 ppm 14-hydroxycodeinone
7,674,800 - Oxycodone hydrochloride having less than 25 PPM 14-hydroxycodeinone
7,674,799 - Oxycodone hydrochloride having less than 25 ppm 14-hydroxycodeinone
7,776,314 - Abuse-proofed dosage system
6,488,963 - Hot-melt extrudable pharmaceutical formulation
27. Ogma LLC v. Lenovo Group Limited et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00312 filed on 7/7/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Lenovo Group Limited; Lenovo Holding Company, Inc.; Lenovo (United States) Inc
Defendant law firm(s): Findlay Craft
Defendant lawyer(s): Eric Hugh Findlay
Patent(s): 5825427 - Image display system
28. Target Training International, LTD. v. Extended DISC International, Ltd.
Case: 4:11-cv-02531 filed on 7/7/2011 in Southern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Target Training International, LTD.
Plaintiff law firm(s): McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.; Slusser, Wilson & Partridge, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Edmund J. Sease; Bradley J. Powers; Michael E. Wilson
Defendant(s): Extended DISC International, Ltd.
Patent(s): 7249372 - Network based document distribution method
29. Worldslide, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores
Case: 2:11-at-00965 filed on 7/8/2011 in Eastern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Worldslide, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Bernheim, Gutierrez & McCready
Plaintiff lawyer(s): William S. Bernheim
Defendant(s): Wal-Mart Stores
Patent(s): 7309302 - Sliding exercise apparatus and recreational device
30. Foldfast, LLC v. Maxi Aids, Inc. et. al.
Case: 0:11-cv-61506 filed on 7/8/2011 in Southern District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): Foldfast, LLC
Defendant(s): Maxi Aids, Inc.; Elliot Zaretsky; Amazon.com, Inc.
Patent(s): 6360927 - Garment folding apparatus
31. Artisent, Inc v. International Armor
Case: 1:11-cv-11210 filed on 7/8/2011 in District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff(s): Artisent, Inc
Plaintiff law firm(s): Birnbaum & Godkin, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David S. Godkin
Defendant(s): International Armor
Patent(s): 7,600,268 - Helmet retention system with improved stability
7,908,667
32. Cobra Products, Inc. v. G.T. Water Products, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-03924 filed on 7/8/2011 in District of New Jersey
Plaintiff(s): Cobra Products, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Mattioni, Ltd
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen J. Galati
Defendant(s): G.T. Water Products, Inc.
Patent(s): 6775873 - Apparatus for removing hair from a drain
33. Ferring B.V. v. Apotex, Inc. et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-00485 filed on 7/8/2011 in District of Nevada
Plaintiff(s): Ferring B.V.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Jones Vargas
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Molly Malone Rezac
Defendant(s): Apotex, Inc. et. al.
Patent(s): 7947739
34. JayBird Gear v. Freebit
Case: 2:11-cv-00638 filed on 7/8/2011 in District of Utah
Plaintiff(s): JayBird Gear
Plaintiff law firm(s): Parr Brown Gee & Loveless
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kara M. Houck; Timothy B. Smith
Defendant(s): Freebit
Patent(s): 6944307
More insights
Structuring Solar IP Claims for Leverage: How System Claims and Induced or Contributory Infringement Can Expand Enforcement Options
Written by: Tyler S. Cox Key Takeaways: Nextpower’s mix of apparatus and system claims illustrates how claim strategy can expand enforcement flexibility. Additionally, carefully drafting patent claims can expand the scope of protection of the claim…

Patexia Insight 256: Patent Litigation Remains Concentrated in Key U.S. District Courts
U.S. District Court patent litigation continues to be one of the most consequential and data-rich arenas in intellectual property enforcement. Between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2025, 18,352 patent cases were filed across federal courts, involving tens of…

Litigation Finance Tax Dropped From Trump S Big Beautiful Bill
In a major development for the billion dollar litigation finance industry, a tax provision targeting litigation funders has been removed from President Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill”,…