Court Upholds $4.3 Million of Jury Verdict Against Depuy Synthes
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Acantha LLC sued Depuy Synthes Sales Inc. and DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., alleging that Depuy’s Vectra and Zero-P VA products infringe U.S. Reissued Patent No. RE 43,008. The patent relates to an orthopedic implant used for joining bone segments.
A jury found that all accused products infringed and awarded over $8.2 million in damages. Depuy moved for judgment as a matter of law that it did not infringe.
The court found insubstantial evidence to support the jury’s finding that the Zero-P VA product infringes, but did find that substantial evidence supported the jury’s finding that the Vectra products infringe. Thus, the court reduced the jury’s damages award to $4,320,136. In addition, the court awarded supplemental damages for pre- and post-verdict sales not accounted for in the jury’s verdict, as well as pre- and post-judgement interest.
The case is Acantha, LLC v. Depuy Synthes Sales Inc. and Depuy Synthes Products Inc., Case No. 15-C-1257 (E.D. Wis.)
Editors: Mark Kachner, Paul Stewart & Yanna S. Bouris
Written by: Brian Horne
More insights
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation of Patent for Lack of Enablement of Claims Directed to a Method of Treating a Patient with a Unit Dosage in Wyeth Llc v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp
Written by : Eric Furman, Ph.D. and Ashley C. Morales Key Takeaway: Federal Circuit invalidates patent claims directed to a method for treating non-small cell lung cancer through administration of “a unit dosage” of an irreversible epidermal…
When About Becomes Indefinite Federal Circuit Provides Guidance for Life Science Patent Applications Regarding Limits of Approximation in Enviro Tech v Safe Foods
Written by : Jason J. Jardine and Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. Key Takeaway: The term “about” remains useful in biotech and pharmaceutical claims, but only if the patent provides objective guidance about what the term means. Absent that guidance,…
When Any Patent Means No Patent Federal Circuit Reverses Non Specific Verdict
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Sophia F. Zahn OLLNOVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. v. ECOBEE TECHNOLOGIES ULC [OPINION] Before Chen , Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : A verdict form…